Influence In Action: Ending Poverty and Hunger
Desired Results: Their goal is to break the cycle of hunger and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa. To do this, they look broadly at systems and cycles and map the dynamics that create and perpetuate this problem.
Focus on Agriculture: The Gates Foundation’s data reveals that the three-quarters of the world’s poorest people rely on agriculture—not manufacturing, retail, or other economic sectors. They’ve also discovered that no country has ever abolished poverty without increasing their agricultural productivity. And yet, very few resources are invested in improving agriculture. Only 4 percent of government spending in Sub-Saharan Africa supports farming, and only 4 percent of official development assistance targets farming. In fact, the fastest growing area within agricultural research is “golf grass.” That’s right, developing new varieties of grass for golf courses. There is also a history of success. In the 1960’s and 70’s the Rockefeller Foundation launched the “Green Revolution,” a massive effort to bring improved grains, fertilizers, and pesticides to the third world. This effort saved millions of lives in Asia and Latin America, and is credited for launching much of the Asian economic miracle.
Map the Value Chain: The next step in the influence process is to map the existing system and look for crucial moments where bad outcomes can be prevented or good outcomes can be provoked. The Gates Foundation has mapped the following agricultural value chain:
- Improving the financing available to small farmers
- Getting high quality seeds, fertilizers, and pesticides
- Improving farming tools and practices
- Solving irrigation problems
- Improving marketing and pricing practices
- Finding ways to get crops to market
Find Crucial Moments: The Gates Foundation identified several crucial breakdowns in the value chain. They’ve looked for patterns in these breakdowns, and have found them. Below are a few of the patterns the Foundation is targeting:
- Aid programs eventually end, leaving poor farmers back where they started—or even worse off.
- Almost all agricultural improvements and practices have targeted the wealthy.
- Women perform 70 to 80 percent of the labor on small farms, and yet few, if any, initiatives have been designed to help them.
How do you deal with the fact that all aid programs eventually end? The Gates Foundation isn’t giving away seeds or building irrigation systems; rather, they are creating an entrepreneurial infrastructure. Every step in the value chain will make somebody a good living—so that outside aid won’t be needed.
How do you create systems that target poor farmers? The data suggests poor farmers can only afford capital expenditures that will pay for themselves within a year. Bottom line: every step in the process needs to be cheap. So, the Gates Foundation is providing the initial infrastructure to change the agricultural sector from a “jewelry-store” model into a “grocery-store” model.
How do you support women? The foundation is making the financial system more user friendly to women. The Grameen Bank’s work in Bangladesh has shown that women are more likely to pay back loans. So, the Gates Foundation is including women in every part of their initiative.
Use All Six Sources of Influence: It’s tough to sort out all the sources of influence the Gates Foundation is using. However, it’s clear they are putting a lot of resources into measurement. If one of their strategies isn’t working, they will be the first to know. They are also collaborating with the Rockefeller Foundation, which knows what didn’t work in their initial Green Revolution.
I’d love to hear about your influence successes or about significant influencers you think we can all learn from. What is it they are doing that works?
Re: Influence In Action: Ending Poverty and Hunger
I am curious as to the source for the claim regarding "golf grass" being the largest researched area in agriculture. This could be misleading in that "golf grass" is a part of a bigger area known as turf. Industrial, Turf, and ornamentals is a segment of agronomy that is highly researched, but compared to Food, Feed, and Fiber it is small "potatoes" (forgive the ag pun). Single companies spend millions if not billions to develop improved crops and technology that are size neutral and beneficial to global agriculture. Of note are several drought tolerant crops that could enhance agronomic success in many impoverished areas.
I believe the Gates Foundation's intent is fantastic. My father was a farmer that participated in the first large scale effort towards high production agriculture known as the Green Revolution. The technology today is driving many great opportunities for global expansion of the food supply. The geo-political and socio economic issues often interfere the most. Not allowing access to sound science. I have found a very well organized and well supported organization called ADCI/VOCA (www.adcivoca.org) that is involved in a vast array of items specific to the exact concerns the Gates' are addressing. There in lies the same issue that affects many issues...dilution and consistency of effort. Making a few organizations more effective is key rather than starting up a host of 'goodwill' efforts that don't have either expertise or accurate vision, but are full of good intentions. ADCI/VOCA has their "stuff" together. They help with process improvement, production management, microfinancing, and much more. I am not a member, but when I retire from my ag career I plan putting my talent to work for their efforts.
Well fed and nourished people can begin to focus on other developmental areas like education that is a powerful engine for social change. The unfortunate thing that I observe is many activists are science illiterates and caught up in the arrogance of their affluence to the point that they can't see the value new technologies bring. And with this affluence and full tummy they lack a reasonable vision or realism of just what sustainable agriculture really is. My father participated in something grand called the green revolution...if he were alive and still farming today. He would adopt all the technologies he could to feed the most people possible.
Re: Influence In Action: Ending Poverty and Hunger
I spent an hour or two last night trying to track down the source the Gates Foundation uses when they say that golf grass is the fastest growing area within agricultural research. I couldn't find it.
A few thoughts: 1) notice they say it's the "fastest growing area" not the largest area within agricultural research. You are absolutely right that the largest research funding still goes to food crops--with corn leading by a large margin. 2) the most important trend is the move from government-funded research to privately funded research. The funding is now overwhelmingly private, which means the resulting crops are patented--not open to all farmers for free. 3) this move to private funding has worked, if your measure is the robust development of new and innnovative crops. The private enterprise is excellent at stimulating growth and entrepreneurship. 4) this situation makes it all the more important that African researchers become a part of the solution. The Gates Foundation's strategy is to create entrepreneurial engines that will keep the innovatons flowing well after the doners are gone--so it's critical that new crops are developed and patented by African entrepreneurs, not large multinational firms. And this is a part of the Gates Foundation plan.
It's neat to hear about your father's experience as a part of the Green Revolution. While the Green Revolution has its critics, its positive benefits are undeniable. The Rockefeller Foundation, which led the Green Revolution, has been among its most open and frank critics. They admit that they used pesticides and herbicides as if they were panaceas--and we know now that they aren't. They also have tracked the ways that small farmers were ignored and sidelined. And they are seeking to remedy these mistakes in this new initiative. The fact that they are joining with the Gates Foundation gives me some confidence that the same mistakes won't be repeated. Of course, there will be new mistakes--we're talking about people here.
thanks,
David
Re: Influence In Action: Ending Poverty and Hunger
Re: Influence In Action: Ending Poverty and Hunger
Excellent observation. I'm also very concerned about protecting species and their environments. In fact, my wife, Kathy, worked for ten years as the environmental program officer at the Bullitt Foundation--a charitable foundation that supports environmental issues in the Pacific Northwest (see www.bullitt.org)
Here is how the Gates Foundation responds to the question you raised: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/GlobalDevelopment/Agriculture/RelatedInfo/Ag_FAQ.htm Check out their answer to the last question on the web page.
thanks,
David
This is a public forum. VitalSmarts and its partners are not responsible for what is posted herein. Comment moderation has been enabled on this blog. All comments must be approved by the blog author or administrator. VitalSmarts makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its authors, employees or readers.
Community standards in the comment area do not permit hate language, profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of VitalSmarts LC and may be edited and republished in any format.
Important Note: The comment areas are not intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.